Laurel Amtower RIP |
Naanaam writes, “We live in a world where the act of thinking, knowledge, and vision have all been commodified. He asserts that by assigning a fixed economic value to books and ideas therein, thinking, as a creative and inquisitive process, has been reduced to pursuing a particular agenda: stabilizing and improving one’s social status. With respect to the status of independent thinking, Naanaam draws an interesting parallel to the way the fast food industry has changed people’s qualitative and quantitative eating habits: “McDonald’s only thinks about filling people up, it does not concern itself with the value of nutrition. I see this as a symbol, for me the act of thinking is akin to the value of nutrition, a reading process that is not accompanied by independent thinking means devouring, it means McDonald’s.”
I came to Mexico with grand ideas. I brought my euphoria, my love for English. I brought a small suitcase filled with classroom memories and experiences. I know my teaching abilities and weaknesses. I am well aware that a suitable learning environment is one that engages students with the material at hand, broadens their horizons, brings dynamism to class, and creates a small English community (in this instance) in which language learners feel secure and comfortable to produce language, make mistakes, and self-evaluate their progress. But already after three weeks of working for the Culturlingua institute, I find that I am “selling” English, not teaching it. I have no option but to stick to the book. No outside material is provided or paid for. Making photocopies is often not welcomed. Books are old and worn-out. They are in need of fundamental revision to sustain interest. The administrative staff seem apathetic to the progress of students. In short, it’s a business establishment. I have put my suitcase of euphoria back in the closet.
Nobody has learned a language from a book. Otherwise I would have been absolutely fluent in Arabic having studied it since sixth grade. In the next several months, this job will pose a massive challenge to me as a teacher. At worst, it will ignite a cold sense of frustration. And at best, it will force me to be more creative and resourceful. At the moment, my discontent aside, I have an ethical commitment to my students. That is all that matters. That is where my focus lies. They look up to me. I cannot let them down.
Aria
Oaxaca..?
ReplyDeleteToday was only my third day at this new school, but already I have noticed a trend similar (although not as extreme) to the one you're facing. Whenever a "visitor" - the parent of a potential new student - comes to see the nursery all the staff goes into an uproar. Air freshener is sprayed in the classrooms. I am frantically lectured to about how I must make the students APPEAR to be actively learning. In case you weren't aware, apparently activities such as playing with puzzles, blocks, and simultaneously singing is the only way to achieve this. Therefore, when a visitor comes I am forced to stop whatever real teaching I'm doing so that the kids can do something that seems more impressive.
When I sarcastically responded once, "So is everything else we do with these kids all day NOT really teaching?" everyone seemed quite baffled as to why I would have a problem with this pretend-learning technique of theres....
So you couldn't be more right - as long as on paper or in a snapshot students appear to be learning and know which canned responses to give to questions they've been trained to answer, ALMOST everyone seems to be satisfied:(